Sunday 18 August 2019

Clarion Call in Defense of Public Education in a New Digital Social Order


Clarion Call in Defense of Public Education in a New Digital Social Order 


“The decisions I made after that moment were not the ones she would have made. They were the choices of a changed person, a new self. You could call this selfhood many things. Transformation. Metamorphosis. Falsity. Betrayal. I call it an education” ― Tara Westover, Educated


A Clarion is a shrill, narrow-tubed trumpet formerly used in war; also, a clear and loud description.

Let me be that soldier or educator with my call out to say that public education as decreed for hundreds of years must not be ingested by the many current online strategies to displace its value. This week for the first time, I saw a TV advertisement and a Facebook page for an online Academy to enroll students from kindergarten to high school. At the same time, the American government requested to cut more than $8.5 billion from the Education Department budget and add a proposed $5 billion plan to support private schools. Realizing the power of mass media, public opinion can be willfully diverted.  

 A public school is an icon of the community. As such, teaching takes an active role in social responsibility in a changing technological society to maintain values, manners and fundamental skills for survival. But when society has undergone such a radical change in such a short time, what do we know how to best educate for survival in this new social order of massive technological changes, information overload where quick tweets can substitute for learned input. 

The public educational process has gone through numerous reformations to meet continuing societal demands. But I worry how public education will survive this technological opponent under various names of modern education, online e-learning and free public virtual schools, especially at the elementary level.

First, I can mainly refer to my 24 years as a public-school teacher teaching grades from grade 3 (7 years old) to grade 8 (14 years old). I have an Bachelor of Education degree based on four years of university teacher preparation with core subjects as well as early childhood development, psychology  and sociology.

Yes, I worked with specific curriculum objectives as mandated by the provincial Department of Education to ensure standardized learning outcomes at every grade level. There were daily lesson plans complete with resources, outlines, activities and evaluations. There was satisfaction at the end of a class and the school year when the students left with more What I Know Now vs What I Didn’t Know when I Started.

Every subject had its particular parameters, facts, schematics, formulas, and hypothesis. But the classroom atmosphere had much more to offer. There could be 30 young people of different backgrounds, aptitudes and abilities in an enclosure who also had to learn the values of obedience, co-operation and group management.  There was mindfulness for students of limited abilities. There was problem-solving and creativity from many perspectives and challenges. There was brainstorming and decision-making with multiple variables where the best alternative was with democratic approval. Analysis was communal and leadership self-evident.

These are essential skills of listening and collaborating that are co-factors in an integrated public-school education, along with a broad based global and historical courses of study from biology to physics to algebra to ancient history to literature. It wasn’t about any student's self-centered preference about whatever I want to learn, but public participation in how society and environment continue to work together. 

No doubt, a public-school system has its constraints in a digital society. Perhaps a well-rounded core education doesn’t matter to your all-knowing cellphone. But it’s not a matter of learning to use a calculator versus learning the multiplication tables by rote; or better yet, by drawing pictures of things multiplying or dividing into equal groups. It’s not a matter of using Google to spell correctly or use grammatical syntax. It’s the sequential thinking process that matters. In my brief encounter with computers in a classroom, I have yet to see a program that outlines how to write specific stylistic paragraphs for various reasons while sharing evaluations for improvements.  

No doubt, several complaints about public education can validate discussions such as too much curriculum being teacher centered; an old grading system related to passing exams; passive disengaged students more electronically geared; overcrowding and school closures; lack of parental involvement; being passed on to higher grades without grade level adequate skills; facing negative group behaviors; too  many extra-curricular distractions; and even, possibly poor teachers who practice favoritism. But I remember my Math professor once saying all you really need is one good teacher to turn you into a life-long student ... maybe he was right … virtual or a real handshake.

No doubt, there are several compliments about online learning that works best for the self-directed motivated students, who can progress at their own pace, working in a home environment, with remote instructors and virtual tutors, with interactive media and resources, automated evaluation via digital logs, and who can manage to stay the course from entertaining games. Parent supervision may be needed  to make sure assignments are turned in. Perhaps you’d agree that this self-directed learning is better for older students or adults interested in upgrading.

But, there are also problems such as lack of social interaction or developing relationships with peers, other than communication on forums, chat rooms, message boards and videos usually with homogeneous viewpoints. So how do you learn to deal with diversity or discrepancy in different  situations?  

Undeniably, digital screens have become the natural habitat of young people in a transformation of subjects and thoughts unlike anything experienced in human history.  This Internet of all Things has created Great Changes in our society and culture forever, but where are the educational safety nets for young developing brains?

For example, my current worry and project is especially about educating teen girls who are surrounded by a brand-new vocabulary and motivation in a Selfie Domain with no training or denotation.

And therein are two problems. First, a general lack of teaching knowledge how to cope with this new subject matter. Usually, any new subject requires learning with clear objectives like any other study; preparation, asking questions, content, decision making and evaluation. Unfortunately, there is a lack of training for young girls at any level to gain any kind of understanding much less mastery over these overwhelming changes. Ignorance and confusion are a lethal mixture.

 The second problem, based on lack of preparation within the context, is how young girls are being taken advantage of by mass media which brainwashes their developing minds with adult prerogatives.  For example, how unnatural is it for young girls to sexualize their bodies to be "LIKE" adult images or role play? Part of this assault is their addiction to their cell phones and manufactured Selfies but with limited educational or survival strategies.

More than ever, I believe public schools are the best places to address and discuss this issue and others related to information overload and hyper social media interaction. These are serious social issues best dealt with by social discussion and remediation where listening, cooperation and empathy play central figures and consensus is mutual.  

I believe that business and political opportunities should not interfere in this sacred passage rite from childhood to adulthood. The future of education must not be monopolized by internet corporate giants with material agendas which is much easier to do with e-learners in digital controlled environments.

There is no doubt that technology as an integral part of daily life, for better and worse, needs to be incorporated into traditional classrooms.The fact remains that more and more educational tools, resources and Apps are always on the horizon to facilitate the learning process and improve outcomes.

But, as a final word, I hope it will be a broad-based public education with an open classroom with different backgrounds, experiences, and decision making based on majority consensus in order to show students how to effectively participate in society and produce positive contributions. 

Your comments and questions are always important to continue this discussion. 

Annemarie
amarie10@gmail.com
https://helpfulmindstreamforchanges.com

PS: You may be interested to read how 24 centuries ago, a Greek philosopher started with an image of a large cave descending into the Earth, our natural connection. Read how how Plato’s allegory of the Cave still applies even more in the search for truth via education especially in a digital world. 

Excerpt: There has never been a greater urgency to make the case that public education must remain democratic, diverse and strong; especially for young people who are the stimulus and hope as they inherit the future with greater degrees of fairness, ethics and justice, both to the kinds of society and environment they want to live in.

https://helpfulmindstreamforchanges.blogspot.com/2019/07/discovering-platos-allegory-of-cave-in.html 


No comments:

Post a Comment

How to Experience a Health and Wealth Revolution with Pure Cell Daily Drops vs Pill Supplements

  Why personal testimonials are undeniable and powerful with Daily Drops, not Pills Do you think that human nature is to select the path of ...