Celebrating How Iceland Deals with Teens’ Problems with Mandated
Offline Self-Discovery Programs
The brilliance of what Iceland implemented was a nationwide
effort to substitute natural highs and other ways of changing brain chemistry
through real experiences that could compete with the synthetic highs found in
drugs (and maybe even cellphones)…How Iceland Got Teens to Say No to Drugs: article
in The Atlantic 2017
Sometimes, I’m sure we may still wonder how we ever survived the hazards of being a teenager. Even without
the internet, how many of our own stories can tell about growing up, tolerating high risks, following our own
rules to discover our brand of independence. It’s the nature of the adolescent
brain functioning more with emotional reactions until more logical extension
patterns develop in the neocortex by the age of 20 plus.
An American professor of psychology, Harvey Milkman, made a
dissertation that drugs and alcohol give children’s brains different types of
stimuli depending on the child’s biology. He said that “children who want a
rush are going to find that through substance abuse or shoplifting or violence.
Children who are anxious are going to use substances (like alcohol) to calm
themselves down and lose the inhibitions that are a consequence of their
anxiety.” Whatever the causation, there are increasing worrying trends among
teens with regard to delinquency, drugs and alcohol abuse and social media fixation.
Can a connection be
made here that addiction to Social Media may be about the search for that
spontaneous excitement or that drama that defies limitations?
The Big Question is how we can use natural
highs with our own brain chemistry to change levels of interest without the deleterious
effects of drugs or self-phone addiction?
What if, our real-life communities can set up regular offline
activities to stimulate the teen’s interests and challenges to counter online
indulgences?
This is an evolving social problem calling for a solution.
Here is what the country of Iceland decided to do recently.
The government mandated
a Self-Discovery Project to provide
young people with many opportunities to engage with each other in a safe place to hang out after school such as
participating in arts and sports programs. Communities set up athletic tracks,
heated indoor pools, and hands-on studios where teenagers could try new things
like music, dance, hip hop, art, martial arts and more. They could show others their talents, be
physically and intellectually active. Their comfort zones could be challenged as they
try new things to add more self-confidence and self-esteem. Low-income families could participate with
subsidized payments.
At the same time, teenagers get life-skills training, which
focus on improving their thoughts about themselves and their lives, and their interactions with real people. “The main principle was that drug education
doesn’t work because nobody pays attention to it. What is needed are the life
skills to act on that information,” Milkman says.
The point is to make these opportunities socially stimulating
enough to produce the same brain rewards as 8 hours of staring at a small
screen.
The entire system was further incentivized with subsidies
and tax breaks for parents as well as a number of agreements to help educate
parents by strengthening their authority in the home such as 8 or 9 parenting
sessions a year. Healthcare organizations, churches, the police
and social services were all encouraged to come together to try to improve teen's well-being and curb substance use.
What a simple idea … give kids something better to do with
their time!
And here’s the result. From 1998 to 2016 the rate of teens who
reported being drunk in the past month dropped from 42 percent to 5 percent.
Cannabis use dropped from 17 percent to 7 percent, and cigarette use declined
from 23 percent to 3 percent.
Such exciting news, but then I read something very disappointing in the same article: How Iceland Got Teens to Say No to Drugs.
“A national program along the lines of Youth in Iceland is
unlikely to be introduced in the US, however. One major obstacle is that while
in Iceland there is long-term commitment to the national project, community
health programs in the U.S. are usually funded by short-term grants.”
Seriously? Is the implication that there is some equivalence between
short terms and life-long youth addiction? Why
would any society sacrifice its youth and potentially create long suffering adults prone to anxiety,
depression, Xanax prescriptions and other health care costs?
Someone needs to make this statement, so I will as a devil’s
advocate. What if, it's not just about
lack of state funding for healthy teens, but more about protecting the big
money interests? Who cares if social media turns teenagers into early consumers
with premature sexual roles, if drugs and mental depression continue to be problems? Who
will advocate to protect their normal social rites of passage minus adult hype?
After all, there’s a lot of money to be made in social
media. In 2017, Snapchat made $1
billion, Twitter made $2 billion, and Facebook made $40 billion. Much of this money comes from advertising,
suggesting that the companies that advertised there also made a lot of money
from user’s clicks. Instagram, which was
purchased by Facebook for $1 billion in
2012, was recently valued at $35 billion.
The bottom line is that these technology giants are even more interested in teens
posting their Selfies, spontaneously clicking and buying into their demonstrations, preying on their
adolescent brains.
What if these giants can help fund programs to help
teenagers find creative excitement and fulfillment offline? This kind of program may take a
trickle out of their pocketbooks but also give access to their hearts and conscience.
Why not give back to those who support your business model to make them better citizens in the future?
In summary, in Iceland, the relationship between people and
the state has allowed an effective national program to cut the rates of
teenagers smoking and drinking to excess—and, in the process, brought families
closer and helped kids to become healthier in all kinds of ways.
Will other countries or communities decide that these long term
benefits are worth much more than any money? Who can put a price on teenagers growing up to be
happy, interested, and productive adults besides corporations or governments?
So many questions, but real excitement is that a country-wide solution has proven to be successful. The banner has been passed to each of us to advocate for our teen children to built a beneficial society for all.
Questions, comments and discussions are always appreciated.
Annemarie
amarie10@gmail.com
833 471 4661
https://helpfulmindstreamforchanges.com
PS: I'm interested in podcast show interviews with 10 questions about teen girls' struggles on Social Media Please forward any hosts who may be interested in this topic.
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. Margaret Mead, anthropologist
No comments:
Post a Comment